Vacfacts
"The Revolution in Virtual Reality"
Theory of Vaccine Derived - Herd Immunity
The idea that immunizations create herd immunity lacks solid scientific evidence. Many studies cited to support immunization-derived herd immunity confuse correlation with causation and show bias when convenient. In contrast, natural herd immunity is well-supported because it often provides lifelong protection. Immunizations, however, typically offer only temporary, partial immunity that can wane over time or become less effective as pathogens mutate such as with the pertussis immunization.
Millions of adults have not received inoculations in decades, yet their childhood inoculations don’t necessarily provide lasting protection against diseases like polio or measles. This raises questions about inoculation effectiveness over time. Moreover, despite claims from authorities that inoculation safety is well established, there is scientific evidence indicating inoculation-related harm, including links to neurological issues and autism spectrum disorders (ASD), which are often ignored or denied by organizations like the CDC.
Is Herd Immunity Real?
Originally, the concept of herd immunity referred to protection that occurred only when people contracted infections naturally. This natural immunity typically lasts a lifetime. However, supporters of preventive treatments extended this idea to immunity gained through such interventions. The problem is that immunity from these treatments usually lasts only a few years—typically between 2 and 10—and mainly affects one part of the immune system.
Because of this limited duration, booster doses became common for many diseases, including those usually caught in childhood, like chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella. Even boosters, however, were found to provide protection for only a short time, sometimes less than two years. This has led to requirements for multiple doses as people enter adulthood, even for diseases once thought to confer lifelong immunity.
The idea that immunity from these preventive measures creates herd immunity is largely a myth. For decades, it was believed that childhood doses provided lifelong protection. But it has since been shown that most lose effectiveness within years, meaning a significant portion of the population such as the baby boomer generation has had little to no protection for decades.
Despite warnings that disease outbreaks could surge if immunization rates drop below a certain threshold, many have lived for decades with a large percentage of the population lacking protective immunity, yet no major epidemics have occurred. The claim that herd immunity depends on widespread preventive treatment is often used to pressure healthcare providers and the public into compliance, but it does not reflect the full reality.
When Protection Fails: Understanding Outbreak Patterns
Recent pertussis outbreaks, along with sporadic cases of measles and mumps, have occurred even among fully treated individuals, calling into question the long-term effectiveness of current immunization strategies. Despite expanded efforts such as family-wide immunization and adult booster campaigns, these measures have not successfully controlled the resurgence of disease. Emerging data also indicate that Bordetella parapertussis a strain not covered by existing protocols is becoming more prevalent, yet remains underdiagnosed due to limited testing. Additionally, concerns about post-treatment pathogen shedding suggest that recently treated individuals may pose a risk to others, including the unprotected. While media coverage often frames such outbreaks as the result of refusal to comply with standard protocols, it frequently overlooks the role of treatment failure and evolving pathogen behavior. These issues point to the need for more transparent discussion, rigorous independent evaluation, and a reassessment of the assumptions driving current public health messaging.
Understanding the Gaps in Herd-Based Defense Strategies :
If preventive treatments truly provide immunity, then a person who has received such protections should be shielded from diseases that others without them might contract. If protection fails, it raises doubts about the effectiveness of these biological preparations.
It’s important to study whether these protective measures actually create lasting defense and to analyze where outbreaks occur. Do these outbreaks mainly affect those without protection, or do they also involve individuals who have undergone preventive treatments?
History shows that outbreaks have sometimes happened even among groups with widespread use of protective injections. In many cases, people previously given these biological preparations have still fallen ill, challenging the belief that such measures alone can stop disease spread.
These observations underscore the need to carefully assess the real-world effectiveness of these interventions and recognize that immunity can vary between individuals. Preventive treatments may not always offer complete or permanent protection.
In conclusion, it’s essential to view disease prevention with a balanced perspective, weighing both the benefits and limitations of protective biological measures.
Glutathione, Tylenol, Adverse Reactions, and ASD :
When children experience adverse reactions after receiving certain health products, it is common for practitioners to recommend substances like Tylenol. However, Tylenol may reduce glutathione levels, a key compound the body relies on to detoxify harmful agents such as aluminum-based additives and preservatives like thimerosal. These products often contain a mixture of chemical ingredients, raising concerns about cumulative toxicity even though this is often overlooked in mainstream discussions. Fever, though sometimes treated as something to suppress, actually plays a vital role in the body's natural response, even when triggered by external interventions. Another concern is contamination during production, both known and unknown. Historical cases include harmful substances found in early formulations of preventive treatments in the mid-20th century. Despite advancements in purification, risks associated with using biologically derived materials in manufacturing still remain.
Immune-Related Hypoxia and Ischemia: A Silent Threat to Brain Health
In rare cases, intense immune responses triggered by external biological agents can lead to serious complications affecting the brain and nervous system. This process may involve a reduction in oxygen and blood flow—known as hypoxia and ischemia within the brain and brainstem, potentially resulting in neurobehavioral deterioration. Clinical signs may range from subtle cognitive impairments to more severe effects like seizures, respiratory failure, and even coma. These outcomes are often linked to microvascular disturbances that go unnoticed in routine medical examinations. Post-mortem analyses have sometimes revealed widespread inflammation and oxygen deprivation in brain tissues, suggesting that the issue may stem from immune-related disturbances in blood circulation rather than a direct infection. Despite existing evidence in the scientific literature, this process remains underrecognized in conventional medical practice, underscoring the need for greater awareness and investigation into immune-mediated vascular effects on brain health.
Gardasil: Are Foreign DNA Fragments Causing Chronic Diseases?
A local community radio program focused on women's hormonal health has become a key platform for discussing ongoing concerns about vaccines developed to prevent cervical cancer. Over the years, the show has kept its audience informed about a growing number of reported adverse reactions linked to these vaccines, emphasizing the real-life impact on families who trusted public health authorities and vaccination campaigns. The program invites experts to share their research and insights, including findings of foreign DNA fragments present in vaccine samples. These discussions explore emerging scientific theories that suggest such fragments could be contributing to various chronic diseases and, in some cases, even fatalities. Through this platform, the show aims to raise awareness, encourage critical examination of vaccine safety, and support those affected by potential vaccine-related health issues.
